|
The
first and last letters of MBTI type often indicate your preferred style
of exploring courses and majors.
EJ Types (ESTJ,
ESFJ, ENFJ, ENTJ)
I want to decide and then get on with it. EJ students often put choosing
a major on their "to do" list soon after reaching college. It
is not uncommon for them to seek career counseling early, hoping to declare
a major before the first semester ends. When they choose wisely, they
usually progress through an orderly series of steps leading to graduation.
Although their style provides them with a clear sense of direction, it
also can have its drawback. For example, an EJ student may decide aat
an early age to be a doctor, lawyer, or engineer but then discover that
he or she lacks the necessary ability or the continuing interest. They
become disappointed and want to hurry up and choose another major because
"I don't want to waste any more time". Ironically, what they
often need to do is slow down and collect more information. When things
work out along the lines that they have planned, EJs are the mountain
climbers of decision-making. They pick out a specific peak to climb and
then proceed toward their goal.
EP Types (ESTP,ESFP,ENFP,ENTP)
I want to experience it all. For EP types, deciding tends to be an ongoing
process. They often decide by trial and error. They typically want, and
try, to do it all-every course, major, or extracurricular activity that
appeals to them is fair game. Changing their mind helps to reassure them
that they still have options open. They may sometimes feel, however, that
they have too many options and don't know how to choose among them. Often
when they talk about trying out a new major, it is because talking is
their way of deciding. Their style, however, can be very difficult for
their parents, especially parents who prefer judging. For an EP type,
a decision is a point of departure, a jumping off place, not a final stop.
They are the bungee jumpers of career decision-making.
IJ Types (ISTJ,ISFJ,INFJ,INTJ)
I want to be sure. The IJ types will probably spend a lot of time researching
and reflecting before reaching a final decision. They often consult books
and other resources on majors and careers. Because they tend to stick
with a decision once it's made, the information they collect must be carefully
considered. Because their thinking is done alone, however, they may surprise
people when they announce their plans. Although this analogy will seem
somewhat cold to those with a preference for Feeling, the IJ types are
the computers of career decision making-all relevant data (including their
values!) go in, are processed carefully, and a decision comes out.
IP Types (ISTP,ISFP,INFP,INTP)
I wonder what I'll want to be when I grow up. IP Students often want to
delay a decision about a major until they can consider all options, which
they do at their own pace. Although they may resist deadlines imposed
by others, they sometimes need that nudge from the outside world to help
them make a decision. When they can tell themselves that no decision is
ever final, they can move ahead. Even in mid-life, they often say they
don't know for sure what they want to be when they grow up. Their style
of decision-making often reflects a struggle between the information coming
to them from the outer world (which can be overwhelming) and their attempt
to be true to their inner world. It may take them a while away from home
to discover the nature of their inner world.
IPs are the wanderers of career decision making. A career path for them
is a never-ending quest for more knowledge, facts, or inspiration.
Research with college
students has shown that developing a sense of purpose is associated with
EJ preferences. Also, when career counselors ranked students on how well
they made appropriate educational plans the following order of preferences
emerged: EJ, EP, IF, and IP.
One study showed that EJ types are the most decided about their majors
and careers, while Ips are the least decisive. In two other studies, the
ISTPs were the most likely to have undecided majors, and the Ips were
the most likely to be attracted to special advising programs.
Summary prepared and (c) 1993 by Tom Carskadon Mississippi state University
Psychology Department
|